Review Drafting
Generates review summaries from goal data, peer feedback, and manager notes — ready for human review.
import.meta.env.PUBLIC_GA_MEASUREMENT_ID && (
)
Skip to content
Generates review summaries from goal data, peer feedback, and manager notes — ready for human review.
Monitors objective progress, sends updates to stakeholders, and flags at-risk goals.
Reminds managers about pending reviews, overdue feedback, and upcoming review cycles.
Identifies declining performance patterns and suggests interventions before they become problems.
The agent drafts structured reviews from real data — goal completion, peer feedback, and manager notes. Managers edit and approve instead of writing from scratch.
Continuous data collection means Q1 contributions weigh equally with Q4. Reviews reflect the full year, not just the last month a manager can remember.
Goal progress is monitored continuously with automatic alerts when targets are at risk. Managers adjust priorities mid-quarter instead of discovering failures at the end.
Context-specific reminders replace generic deadline warnings. "Alex's pipeline goal is at 40% with 3 weeks left" drives action; "Reviews due soon" does not.
Pulls from goals, OKRs, peer feedback, project completions, and attendance records.
Creates a structured review summary highlighting strengths, areas for growth, and data-backed insights.
Manager edits, adds context, and approves. Nothing goes to the employee without human sign-off.
The agent drafts review summaries based on collected data — goal completion rates, peer feedback quotes, manager notes, and project outcomes. The manager reviews the draft, edits it to add personal context or adjust tone, and approves it before the employee sees anything. The agent provides the evidence; the manager provides the judgment.
It pulls from OKR/goal tracking (native or integrated), peer feedback responses, manager 1-on-1 notes, project management tools (Jira, Asana, Linear), code review metrics for engineering teams, and any custom metrics you define. The more data sources connected, the more comprehensive the review drafts.
The agent collects feedback and data from all teams an employee contributes to. The primary manager sees a consolidated view with section breakdowns by team. Dotted-line managers can submit feedback that appears in the review draft alongside direct-line data.
Yes. You define the review template — sections, rating scales (1-5, exceeds/meets/below, or custom), competency frameworks, and required fields. The agent generates drafts that follow your format exactly. Templates can differ by department or role level.
The agent uses the full review period — typically one quarter or one year, depending on your cycle. It weights data evenly across the period to eliminate recency bias. If you switch to Zimyo mid-cycle, the agent uses whatever data is available from connected sources and notes the coverage gap.
After three ignored nudges on the same item, the agent escalates to the manager's manager or HR, depending on your escalation policy. The escalation includes what was due, when the nudges were sent, and the current status. This is configurable — you set the threshold and escalation path.
Join 500+ US companies that replaced HR busywork with AI agents. Sign up and start in minutes.
Get Started